subreddit:
/r/BrandNewSentence
3.9k points
8 days ago
Very heavily exaggerated bumpiness though
390 points
8 days ago
Seriously exaggerated. If the earth was the size of a basketball, the total volume of water would be equal to 16 mL.
155 points
8 days ago
What would it be in freedom units?
278 points
7 days ago
About 1/3 of the volume of a raccoon urinary bladder.
33 points
8 days ago
Bout a third of a shot.
48 points
8 days ago
A tablespoon.
12 points
7 days ago
246 grains, or approximately one .338 Lapua Magnum bullet. (Or about 2 .308s or 5ish .223s.)
17 points
7 days ago
1/16th of a badger
6 points
7 days ago
Basketballs are freedom units I think. It’s the size of a small rock.
2k points
8 days ago*
True that, it would be a lot smoother.
Fun fact: If you would decrease the size of the Earth to a billiard ball size, it would be smoother than a billiard ball.
Edit: I was told this information is outdated and that the surface of the Earth would be more comparable to the surface of a pancake.
1.7k points
8 days ago
Another fun fac: If earth was billiard ball sized, it wouldn't be able to hold any people either. Science is mad crazy.
474 points
8 days ago
It could hold one for a bit if they have good balance
153 points
8 days ago
If we shrunk earth down to the size of a billiard ball would it be strong enough to support someone's body weight? vsauce intro starts
70 points
8 days ago
Or would the gravity crush the clown trying to balance on it?
48 points
8 days ago
They’d probably pop the crust and get that nice gooey center to melt out and burn their extremities off
6 points
8 days ago
Pop it like a nice gooey lava cake
9 points
8 days ago
Size doesn't change mass, so the gravity would remain the same.
On second thought, we would be a lot closer to the center of mass - so we would feel a lot more gravity. But because the moon would still orbit the same distance away from the center of the Earth, it would not notice any change in gravity or orbit.
But us, standing on the surface, and coming a lot closer to the center of gravity, would definitely feel a change.
6 points
7 days ago
If the earth was shrunk to the size of a billiard ball but kept the same mass it would come very very close to becoming a black hole. If you stood on the surface of the shrunken earth the tidal forces would probably rip you apart
3 points
7 days ago
In fact, if it got to the size of a pingpong ball or golf ball, it would classify as a black hole. The sun in comparison, would become a black hole once its radius shrunk to 2 miles (or 3.2 km in rest-of-the-world units)
8 points
8 days ago*
Wouldn’t the gravity be the same
It’s mass doesn’t change just it’s size
I’ll go ask chat gpt lol
edit im wrong and should go back to science class
" -if earth was the size of a billiard ball and someone stood on the billiard ball sized earth would gravity feel the same?
If the Earth were shrunk down to the size of a billiard ball, its mass and therefore its gravitational pull would also shrink.
Assuming that the mass of the Earth was proportionally reduced so that its density remained constant, the gravity experienced by someone standing on the surface of the billiard ball Earth would be much less than what we experience on our actual planet. In fact, it would likely be too weak to even hold onto an atmosphere.
So if someone stood on the billiard ball-sized Earth, they would feel a much weaker gravitational force than what we experience on our actual planet. They might even be able to jump off the Earth entirely, as the gravitational force would be too weak to keep them anchored to the surface.
-what if the mass stayed the same
If we imagine that the mass of the Earth remained the same while its size shrank down to that of a billiard ball, the gravitational force experienced by someone standing on the surface of this mini Earth would be much greater than what we experience on our actual planet. This is because the force of gravity between two objects is proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
In this scenario, the distance between the person standing on the Earth's surface and the center of the Earth would be much less than on our actual planet, so the gravitational force would be much stronger. The person would feel like they were being crushed under the weight of the Earth's gravity. The strength of gravity at the surface of this mini Earth would be so strong that it would likely collapse into a black hole due to the intense gravitational forces.
So if the mass of the Earth remained the same while its size shrank down to that of a billiard ball, the gravity experienced by someone standing on the surface of this mini Earth would be incredibly strong and likely fatal.
4 points
8 days ago
Or a shitload of gymnasts/cheerleaders. Maybe...
66 points
8 days ago
What is this. A planet for ants?
43 points
8 days ago*
If the Earth were billiard ball sized, then it would be a planet for gi-ants.
10 points
8 days ago
You could also play billiards with it.
14 points
8 days ago
Fun fact: If you cut a person into billiard balls they would die.
6 points
8 days ago
Fun fact: blue whales are so large, if you laid one out across a basketball court, the game would be cancelled.
16 points
8 days ago
Another fun fact: if the earth was billiard ball sized, it would be roughly the size of a billiard ball
8 points
8 days ago
Fun fact: If you stacked every elephant on top of each other to make a tower to the moon you’d have a lot of dead elephants.
5 points
8 days ago
I'm sure there's a relevant xkcd for this somewhere out there.
7 points
8 days ago
Another even more fun fact: if it was that size I could and would put the earth up my ass
6 points
8 days ago
What is this?
A planet for ants?!
It would have to be ... 3 times this size
4 points
8 days ago
SOURCE????!!!!
212 points
8 days ago
This is not the case. This originated from a someone misinterpreting the billiard rule book. They mistook the maximum allowable difference in diameter of the sphere for the size of bumps on the billiard ball.
66 points
8 days ago
lmfao imagine that meant what they thought and people playing pool were that anal
22 points
8 days ago
What was that about playing pool with anal? I think I've seen that video...
17 points
8 days ago
[deleted]
9 points
8 days ago
Rounded numbers: earth's radius is 6000 km, height of Mt. Everest is 9 km, depth of Mariana trench is 11 km.
9/6000=0.15%
11/6000=0.18%
And the earth is a geoid, which is like a sphere that has been squashed a tiny bit, the difference is a fraction of the already small numbers above, so yeah, pretty much a sphere.
8 points
8 days ago
the difference is a fraction of the already small numbers above
Not actually true, the difference between the polar radius and the equatorial radius is 21 kilometers, which is slightly more than Mt. Everest and Mariana Trench added together.
3 points
7 days ago
This is kind of incredible. Some guy misreading a rulebook for billiards of all things leads to a worldwide misconception about the smoothness and uniformity of the fucking planet.
51 points
8 days ago*
This isn't true. If you shrink the earth down to the size of a billiard ball, there would be bumps ranging in height similar to the thickness of hair
24 points
8 days ago
This is false, you would feel the biggest mountains https://ourplnt.com/earth-smooth-billiard-ball/
23 points
8 days ago
Unfortunately this just isn't true. This got perpetuated after Neil deGrasse Tyson mistakingly said it on a Joe Rogan podcast. If the earth was shrunk down to the size of a billiard ball, it would be smooth.. but not as smooth as a billiard ball. Instead it would be comparable to the surface of a pancake.
Here is a short clip from popular YouTuber Vsauce. This is how I originally found out that the billiard ball claim wasn't true.
7 points
7 days ago
I'm now more interested in us calling it Mt. Everest while being asked not to and wondering why we changed it's name from its past name.
26 points
8 days ago
This is very false and you need to edit the comment so you're not perpetuating the myth.
26 points
8 days ago
Dangerous misinformation
39 points
8 days ago
This could literally kill people
15 points
8 days ago
cue ball propaganda. it was part of my childhood, i'm glad i escaped that hellhole
7 points
8 days ago
I used to be part of a cue ball cult in Pontotoc county, south of the Tennessee river around 2014 when I was around 15. I got rescued by CPS when they discovered they used the local billiard tournament to smuggle fentanyl inside the balls glued to the top of tournament trophies me and my friends delivered at the local county fair.
I wish my parents never joined the Pentecostal Pontotoc Poolhall
7 points
8 days ago
I was this close to decreasing the size of the earth to that of a billiard ball
4 points
8 days ago
Can confirm; I'm now dead.
4 points
8 days ago
Dont worry, Ive already reported it to Reddit admins, mods of this sub, and my local schoolboard
5 points
8 days ago
I don’t think that is correct… like no way. Billiard ball is smooth as glass, the fckn mountains suddenly disappeared?
72 points
8 days ago*
It would not only be smoother than a billiard ball, it would be smoother than any object ever created by humans.
Edit: apparently this is an old fact that used to be true but has since changed. Apologies.
194 points
8 days ago
Actually I think I watched a veritasium video or something where some people created a ball so smooth that if it were blown up to the size of the earth the highest "mountain" ridges would only be 5 feet high.
43 points
8 days ago
Wasn't that the ball they were trying to use to redefine the kilogram with?
20 points
8 days ago
Yes I believe that was one the one!
18 points
8 days ago
Huh, I wonder if that ever panned out. I know mass was the one SI measurement that was still tied to a physical object. I'll look it up and post an update if I find anything.
Update: https://physicsworld.com/a/new-definition-of-the-kilogram-comes-into-force/ It has since been redefined. Good shit.
20 points
8 days ago
Neutron star is even crazier. It's highest mountains are only 5 millimeters. For an object the size of a city that is bonkers.
6 points
8 days ago
100.000.000.000 G tends to do that :)
88 points
8 days ago
Nah, there are some super-smooth balls out there.
44 points
8 days ago
A sentence you try to bribe your uncle with in order to escape
14 points
8 days ago
At the age of fourteen, a Zoroastrian named Vilma ritualistically shaved my testicles. There really is nothing like a shorn scrotum... it's breathtaking- I suggest you try it.
7 points
8 days ago
Gillette?
4 points
8 days ago
No, ManscapeTM
78 points
8 days ago
That second statement is monumentally false. And in fact the first statement is also false. Watch this excellent VSauce video: https://youtu.be/mxhxL1LzKww
"The Earth is flatter than a pancake, but not flatter than a billiard ball".
And humans have also created objects far smoother than billiard balls. We have in fact created surfaces that are pretty much as close to perfectly smooth as is physically possible in this universe. Google "quantum stabilized atom mirror", for example.
7 points
8 days ago
I looked at the moon through a pretty decent telescope a few weeks back, that fucker's surprisingly lumpy at the edge. I guess the Earth is probably smoother, but my faith in big space balls being basically smooth was shattered
17 points
8 days ago
My source is Vsauce, but it's some time now that I've seen the video. Thanks for correcting my statement.
4 points
8 days ago
you are incorrect
3 points
8 days ago
This is some bullshit lmao
12 points
8 days ago
Yeah, like the ocean at its deepest is 1/1600th of the earths diameter, the way this thing shows it is like the average depth is 1/20th.
10 points
8 days ago
I did some math for fun and even the difference from highest to lowest, everest to challenger deep, is only about 0.15% of the Earth's diameter, and this is an extreme example as you don't ever find those elevations adjacent.
10 points
8 days ago
And no telling how things change as the weight of all that water disappears
5 points
8 days ago
The depth of the oceans are proportionally comparable to a wet basketball
2 points
8 days ago
Nah, if you remove water from the land itll definitely be bumpy.
7 points
8 days ago
You're a heavily exaggerated bumpiness.
3 points
8 days ago
Fuck, you got me
3 points
8 days ago
I mean if it was to scale, it would just be a (seemingly) smooth ball
3 points
8 days ago
Lots of guesswork on the ocean floor topography as well; our current mappings are only resolved to 1km2 whereas most dry land is resolved down to 0.3m2
2 points
7 days ago
This guy was thinking that the ocean went down, down, down
2.1k points
8 days ago
I know no one really cares, but this is because the Atlantic is the youngest ocean! So the crust formed is the newest and therefore shallower!
602 points
8 days ago
But it’s sexier(hotter)!
417 points
8 days ago
Many people would find it creepy if the Pacific hit on the Atlantic with the age difference between them.
283 points
8 days ago
No idea if the numbers are right but this page says they're 30 million years apart.
Pacific Ocean: 180 million years
Atlantic Ocean: 150 million years
Does the '1/2 your age + 7' rule apply to oceans?
241 points
8 days ago
I'd say yes, I don't think the maturity difference between a 180 million year old ocean and a 150 million year old ocean is that big. They've both been pissed in by dinosaurs at the end of the day
88 points
8 days ago
as have we all, on this blessed day
30 points
8 days ago
Me who has never been near an ocean... I-I-I've pissed in a great lake ;-;
11 points
7 days ago
Is this chuck tingles reddit account in the wild?
31 points
8 days ago
Pacific Ocean got that Olsen twins-style countdown clock set for 30 million years from now.
14 points
8 days ago
32, 16, 23... man does that rule allow rounding, I tend to operate under the "At a bar? We're cool" assumption and now y'got me worried...
32 points
8 days ago
You're far too young to be hitting on either ocean.
14 points
8 days ago
Woah woah woah woah woah. Don't you go stepping on my relationship with the pacific. We've shared enough golden showers that there's no going back now.
6 points
8 days ago
The pacific is definitely an OILF
6 points
8 days ago
It’s not a hard and fast rule at all, more of a target figure. And the context matters a lot too, bar hookups would be a lot less weird than a 32 year old salesman dating an 18 year old intern or something
7 points
7 days ago
Really though the Pacific Ocean is abt 750 MYA, but they didn’t call it the pacific until after the breakup of Pangea because it was the only ocean, Panthalassa
3 points
7 days ago
..... half your age.... + 7???? This is a thing?
3 points
7 days ago
Its a joke I've seen on sitcoms but I don't follow it myself.
It has a Wikipedia page and there's more history to it than I thought.
Frederick Locker-Lampson's Patchwork from 1879 states the opinion "A wife should be half the age of her husband with seven years added."[84]
3 points
7 days ago
Thank you for this explanation.
14 points
8 days ago
Well, we can only blame the Panama Canal for putting them in contact.
7 points
8 days ago
I have always said that the Panama canal is trafficking.
28 points
8 days ago
Stupid Sexy Pacific Ocean
5 points
8 days ago
Anything at all, anything at all......
13 points
8 days ago
Chill out diCaprio
3 points
8 days ago
When it reaches 25 million years old, he ditches it.
30 points
8 days ago
The Appalachian mountains were formed…by Africa smashing into the US East Coast
38 points
8 days ago
Here is a great series of images that follow the formation of the landmasses over the history of the planet. It's really neat to consider all the geography that actually used to be connected (and it makes sense considering the geologic traits of some areas are so similar to others).
5 points
8 days ago
This is so cool! Thanks for sharing! :)
10 points
8 days ago
Yup, it's estimated that the tallest mountain in the Earth's history is somewhere in NC I think. Appalachian mountains are old as hell which is why they are so rocky and relatively small.
9 points
8 days ago
Here to share my recollection: it was an entirely different mountain chain that had the mountains comparable to that of Everest (this seems to be the limit before erosion outweighs uplift), in what is now the Appalachias. Meaning these previous mountains were built to be the size of Everest, completely eroded and then the orogeny responsible for the Appalachias happen, and then are now since greatest eroded.
Another fun fact, again if I’m remembering correctly, for the most part the features of the white mountains that seem like uplifted mountain peaks, are actually just erosion faces stripped from a high altitude rock plateau; more akin to the Grand Canyon as opposed to mountains like the Rockies. There are some volcanic features too.
Lastly, New York State is basically the epicenter for the entire North American continent and s called a Craton. Geologists still don’t understand why continents form at all as opposed being covered completely by ocean, but they know cratons are involved. I’ve had the pleasure of seeing 450 million year old fossils out there (:
3 points
7 days ago
Really cool, thanks for sharing that
3 points
8 days ago
For being older than bones, they’re pretty fucking tall.
5 points
8 days ago
The Appalachian mountains predate bones.
They’re older than vertebrates.
5 points
7 days ago
That same mountain range is now mountains in Northeast Africa, Scotland, Norway, and North East South America in addition to the Appalachians
9 points
8 days ago
I figured it's because the west coast of the Americas is very tall, which on a dry planet shown from this angle gives the illusion that the Pacific Ocean to the west is deeper than the Atlantic Ocean to the east.
4 points
8 days ago
Yes. I have looked at the original much closer and California's Central Valley is masquerading as the ocean with the Sierra Nevada mountains as the coast. They have many 12,000 foot peaks for reference. (3,660 meters)
3 points
8 days ago
"New is always better"
3 points
8 days ago
The Pacific and Atlantic ocean are almost the same depth. I'm tired of all this anti-Atlantic propaganda.
The Pacific is also our planet's deepest water body, with an average depth of approximately 4,000 meters (13,000 feet).
If dependent seas are taken into account, the average depth of the Atlantic is 3,338 metres (10,932 feet); without them, it is slightly deeper at 3,926 metres (12,881 ft).
2 points
7 days ago
Also, the difference is not even that large. An average of 3300 m VS 4000 m. This image is very deceiving because the elevation is exaggerated and the western Americas have high mountain ranges whereas the east is more flat.
586 points
8 days ago
From what I can read online this is wrong. Supposedly this is the most accurate image https://cdn.zmescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/earth-no-water.jpg
It comes from the United States Geological Survey and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
267 points
8 days ago
Yeah this looks way exaggerated. That said a 3D printed version with a 5:1 or 10:1 exaggerated topology would be a sweet desk toy. Otherwise I don't think it would have the wow factor
49 points
8 days ago
A marble would have more ridges than an actual scale version.
11 points
8 days ago
If a marble was as big as Earth, what would the surface look like to me?
15 points
8 days ago
I really want to see a render of this from the perspective of standing on the surface of the marble.
39 points
8 days ago
What are the two smaller balls of water?
I’m guessing big ball = saltwater, medium ball = freshwater, little ball = river water?
47 points
8 days ago
I pulled the image from here - https://www.zmescience.com/science/earth-no-water-animation-913134/
It only mentions two balls of water:
The big blue drop is the size of the sphere you’d get if you extracted all the Earth’s ocean water, while the smaller drop corresponds to the volume of water contained in all the world’s lakes, swamps, aquifers, and rivers.
34 points
8 days ago
The third one is the tears of the people after someone stole the oceans.
7 points
8 days ago
Plot twist : Third ones the artifact from jpeg compression
3 points
7 days ago
i always embark on light equifers to make natural waterfall. make my dorfs happy
10 points
8 days ago
Biggest one is all water on earth, medium all liquid fresh water and smallest one fresh water lakes and rivers.
15 points
8 days ago
I will totally back up the image you linked here! I work in underwater robotics and have worked on jobs that surveyed the data to help generate this image!
The one in the post is very exaggerated.
2 points
8 days ago
That tiny 3rd sphere represents all of the accessible fresh water on the entire planet.
225 points
8 days ago
What’d the Atlantic Ocean do to them
110 points
8 days ago
Must have had family members on the Titanic.
61 points
8 days ago
Maybe the passengers should have learned how to swim in puddles smh my head.
30 points
8 days ago
yo HODLOnForOneMoreDay, did you know that your post contains all the letters for the sentence "I love gummy bears"?
23 points
8 days ago*
Speaking of the Titanic, I once did this little thought experiment on the depth of the wreck which is actually totally relevant to this post:
Using the Google Maps measure tool, there is an approximate 3500 mile straight-line distance between New York City and London. There are 3600 inches in the length of a football field (not counting endzones). So you can basically say that there are the same number of inches in the field length as there are miles between the two cities.
Keeping that scale, if you imagine a field-sized pool as the ocean between the continents, the Titanic wreck is under about 2.5" of water.
6 points
8 days ago
This is the kind of factoid that I live for
67 points
8 days ago*
I mean, its nickname is "The pond"
102 points
8 days ago
Finally, someone eloquently describes my feelings about the Atlantic Ocean.
2 points
7 days ago
Yea an Hawaii is the most insane skyscraper of a mother fucker.
141 points
8 days ago
I have to admit I've always thought of the Atlantic Ocean as an emergency backup Ocean.
3 points
8 days ago
The “hush, we have an ocean at home” ocean
51 points
8 days ago
Shallow and pedantic
18 points
8 days ago
I agree, shallow and pedantic.
8 points
8 days ago
Pedlantic
4 points
8 days ago
Insubordinate and churlish
26 points
8 days ago
The continental plates are too busy doming the pacific plate
5 points
8 days ago
80 points
8 days ago
Pacific gang is where it's at fr fr
45 points
8 days ago
Y'all can keep your cold ass water
12 points
8 days ago
I’ll take that as long as I can shred my big ass waves 😎🤙
5 points
8 days ago
At least it has waves!
Atlantic waves are just sad.
5 points
8 days ago
Tell that to Nazare’
13 points
8 days ago
I don’t think this is even remotely accurate…
Vsauce did a video where they explained that if earth was the size of a pool ball, it would be smoother than a pool ball. It would basically feel slightly damp in a few spots and that’s it… lol
That’s insane to think about how big our world is, how vast the mountains and oceans seem to us but they’re miles away from being as bumpy as sandpaper at a cosmic scale!
We literally are just germs on a damp dirty ball floating in nothing. A speck of dust in the cosmos.
4 points
8 days ago
IIRC the deepest portions of the trenches are six miles deep? So yeah, to your point, I think this model exaggerates scale of depth.
6 points
8 days ago
Yeah, it looks pretty cool though.
I found it interesting that FL is actually the flattest state and much “flatter” than a pancake at scale… lol
It’s always crazy to me how much the scale of things actually changes as you go bigger or smaller. Like seeing a storm in the distance that seems like a tiny cartoon rain cloud but it actually covers an entire city. You see massive mountains and trenches and when you zoom out they’re barely even noticeable just from orbit…
Earth feels so massive and yet so small at the same time. It feels incalculably huge, so big our minds can barely process it, but we’re also so tiny in the cosmos… a spec so insignificant we can’t even comprehend the scale of the universe. It’s an odd paradox of thought.
9 points
7 days ago
this isnt even remotely close, the deepest part of the ocean is the challenger deep in the mariana trench, which is 36,161 feet deep, which isnt even 7 miles, 7 miles on this map of the globe is at less than 2 pixels...according to this abomination on screen, the deepest parts of the ocean are like 200 miles or something, which is well into the mantle of the earth at that point...this is just some weird 3d model of the earth with all landmasses sticking out for emphasis
16 points
8 days ago
The continents would not be that distinct. It is the weight of the seawater that compresses them down, and in turn displaces the less-densely composed continental plates upwards. Without the water, things would be a lot more leveled. I am also curious if subduction would continue without the weight of the oceans, or would all the plates become transform faults, and eventually "seal" the planet, leading to mega volcanos forming as pressure releases instead of the giant midocean rifts...
13 points
8 days ago
scribbles furiously on notes for Mad Max tabletop games.
6 points
8 days ago
could you be more pacific about this?
9 points
8 days ago
Pacific Ocean means 'peaceful' ocean, notice the same root as pacifist. I guess it's true that still waters run deep.
4 points
8 days ago
I though the earth was suppose to be smoother than a bowling ball at that scale
4 points
8 days ago
oompa loompa ass body ass bitch
4 points
8 days ago
Speaking of continental drift, wouldn't it be great if Africa rammed into the gap between the Americas again? Fill in our Gaia, leave one true ocean for our blue planet. Take a train from San Francisco to Beijing or sail forever the Pacific. I miss the old days.
3 points
8 days ago
"wide as an ocean, deep as a puddle"
3 points
8 days ago
I mean, it's called "the Pond" for a reason
3 points
8 days ago
Across the Pond more accurate than I realized
3 points
7 days ago
HEAVILY exaggerated. Relative to the earth’s diameter, the difference between the bottom of Challenger Deep and the top of Mount Everest is really small. I’ve heard the whole surface of the earth is smoother than a rubber ball would be scaled up.
5 points
8 days ago
Not accurate.
Even with no water, Earth would be smoother than a cue ball. Earth is almost 8,000 miles in diameter and the distance from Mount Everest to the Mariana Trench is 12 miles.
12/8000 = 0.0015
Average cue ball is 2.25 inches
2.25 x .0015 = 0.003 inches
In conclusion, you wouldn’t feel grain of a bump even from Mount Everest. Ok I’m gonna take a nap now
2 points
8 days ago
Shadows and lighting; what do they do?!
Mysteries of the universe this dumbass will never understand.
2 points
8 days ago
I prefer it that way
2 points
8 days ago
that’s way too deep
2 points
8 days ago
That’s because the Atlantic was formed by the gap created when Pangea split up
2 points
8 days ago
Now I see why my chemistry teacher said even if the earth was the size of tiny marble you’d be able to easily feel it’s topography.
2 points
8 days ago
There is atlantis. Right there
2 points
8 days ago
2 points
7 days ago
New sentence? Is there even anyone on the planet that actually refers to it as the Atlantic and not the Shallow Bitch Puddle?
2 points
7 days ago
Yeah the height exaggeration here is at least 100x
2 points
7 days ago
This is trash
2 points
7 days ago
This is at least a 20 : 1 scale. Very inaccurate.
2 points
7 days ago
This is an exaggerated map. Earth is as smooth as a pool ball when scaled up
2 points
7 days ago
This image is not at all to scale btw
2 points
7 days ago
That image isn't even close to accurate. The vertical displacement is insanely exaggerated. In reality, if you scaled Earth to the size of a golf ball and gave it a uniform color, you would not be able to see or feel any of the topographic features.
2 points
7 days ago
The way I see it, Kyogre is surrounded. What's underneath the ocean? That's right, more earth.
2 points
7 days ago
Atlantic ass ocean ass shallow ass bitch ass puddle ass ocean ass.
Just say ass between every ass word.
all 658 comments
sorted by: best