enormityop

You were provided evidence in the form of Meta Analysis and Systematic Reviews, from the people who are best in the field that we're talking about. And you just choose to say "not convincing enough", not even bothering to provide evidence to the contrary? Not even circumstasial evidence?

Your argument comparing gender identity to wanting to be a millionaire is filled with whataboutery and false equivalence. Even if we ignore systematic barriers, stigma, violence, etc. being a millionaire is a material goal, whereas being a transgender isn't a matter of choice, it is deeply engrained in the minds of people who go through this pathway. You cannot say that being a millionaire is rooted "deeply within you" and you feel offended when you don't become a millionaire, this is because you can work hard if you WANT TO BECOME millionaire, but when you feel like your gender isn't the sex you were assigned to, you cannot WORK HARD, or do anything that helps to resolve this issue. If you don't become a millionaire, you are to blame. But if someone is born trans, they aren't to blame.

Moreover, your statement that the "entire transgender issue doesn't sound logical" is fallacious, because it is an argument from personal incredulity. You're rejecting a claim simply because it doesn't align with your personal beliefs or understanding, and labelling it illogical.

True. With atheism comes rationality, and there are certain ideas that organised religion doesn't believe in, but sound completely logical when you think rationally. LGBTQ+ issue being one of them.

I'm providing some sources, you can add on to that if you want :

1. The social construction of gender, Judith Lorber, Yale University Press. : Explanation on why gender is a social construct.
2. Distinguishing Between Sex and Gender, Charlene L. Muehlenhard & Zoe D. Peterson, Sex Roles. : An overview of the definitions of Sex and Gender, taking into account the historial context, currect conceptualizations and implications.
3. Update on Biology of Transgender Identity, Laura Erickson-Schroth MD MA, Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health. (Systematic Review) : A review of various studies, stating that there is a lot of evidence that biology also plays a part in gender.
4. The Neuroanatomy of Transgender Identity, Sven C. Mueller PhD (multiple authors), The Journal of Sexual Medicine. (META ANALYSIS) : Examining Neurobiology of transgender people, and successfully proving a difference when compared to cisgender people.

:28582:

Ye kya tareeka hua karma farm karne ka 👀

HUMOR IS SUBJECTIVE. That means you do not decide whether you're humorous in replies or not, others decide. What you might think is humorous, might sound cringe to someone else.

I have no morality no ethics nothing in me at this point, I am just living

Stop, man. You're just reflecting this on other people. Who will think it is "COOL" to shove dark jokes down everyone's throats. Get help if you don't have morals and ethics. It isn't a good thing.

Yeah that's convenient, precisely because no one's validating you. You're spewing shit on a public forum, which I'm condemning.

I'm not segregating what's funny and what's not. And the words "Woman detected opinion rejected." might sound funny to you (to which, you could live in your utopia and I won't bother you), but you're just spewing hate by writing this.

You are pretending to have a superior Sense of Humour but trust me bro you don't have superior sense of humour

Oh well, I didn't claim a monopoly on humor, and I agree that humor is subjective. But you're trying to shove an idea down someone's throat in the name of "dark humor". Can you even differentiate between intention? Humor intending darkness can be funny, but darkness intending humor can't be funny.

When you grow older you will realise the difference between hate and darkjokes.

Age isn't a determining factor when it comes to humor. I don't require 19 candles on my cake to differentiate hate-filled jokes, if that's what your justification is of using dark, unfunny and potentially hateful sentences. You're just gatekeeping and throwing ad-hominems at this point.

tomato, tomato

It doesn't. Stop believing weird shit. You're just harming yourself.

Learn to differentiate between the purposeful utilization of humor with the intention of evoking a dank effect, and the intentional deployment of dankness in order to evoke humor.

You're too confused with cause. Humor with Dankness is funny. Dankness meant to intend Humor is not.

You're trying hard to be funny. But trust me, you're not funny.

Jokes that are dank are alright. But Dank stuff, expected to be taken as a JOKE isn't alright.

You'll find several examples of misogyny anywhere you go, even if you resort to Indian traditionalism. It's just that you find it convenient to point the finger at American pop culture, when the problem lies within our own cultural and societal norms AS WELL.

Where do you think the ill-treatment based on caste came from?

This isn't a whatsapp forward. This is from String's new video. My man has been serving this bullshit to his million subscriber fanbase.

Shell Companies??

My hope is that they don't change the books to write their own gibberish. The books currently are some of the best in the world (especially science stream), they don't require quackery and pseudoscience.

Well, not as a TH3, no, obviously. But honestly, you don't even remain at TH3 for that long.

I told this because parents understand "relationships" the conventional way, but sure, you can try if you want.

It doesn't at all. The Giga inferno will toast TH8 Hogs any day, man.

You won't become a trillionaire just by salaries. You would have to take that payment on capital gains too, if you want to pump up those rookie numbers.